BRIJESHKUMAR JIVRAM MISHRA vs MOHAMMED ZAMIRULLA KHAN AND ANR Advocate - S C Chandratre, ,Pradyumna Sharma,RESPONDENT NO. 1 — APL/869/2018

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 30th March 2026.

CNR: HCBM010328482018

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

06th August 2018

Filing Number

APL/869/2018

Filing Date

09-07-2018

Registration No

APL/869/2018

Registration Date

20-07-2018

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c)
Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

BRIJESHKUMAR JIVRAM MISHRA

Adv. P D JAIN AND CO

Respondent(s)

MOHAMMED ZAMIRULLA KHAN AND ANR Advocate - S C Chandratre, ,Pradyumna Sharma,RESPONDENT NO. 1

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

06-08-2018

FOR ADMISSION - CIRCULATION (CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS)

30-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION

13-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION

20-02-2026

FOR ADMISSION

04-02-2026

FOR DIRECTION

Orders

30-03-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Case Summary: APL/869/2018 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay allowed the applicant's petition and quashed Criminal Complaint No. 1089/SS/2018 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Key Reasoning: The court found that the cheque dispute arose from a civil matter involving property and maritime transactions. A consent agreement dated 27/01/2016 made the cheque conditional on the respondent vacating a leased flat. When the respondent failed to vacate despite a competent authority's direction, the applicant stopped cheque payment as a preemptive legal measure—not an act of dishonesty. Since the respondent breached the settlement terms, no legal liability existed, making this fundamentally a civil dispute unsuitable for criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: APL/869/2018 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay allowed the applicant's petition and quashed Criminal Complaint No. 1089/SS/2018 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Key Reasoning: The court found that the cheque dispute arose from a civil matter involving property and maritime transactions. A consent agreement dated 27/01/2016 made the cheque conditional on the respondent vacating a leased flat. When the respondent failed to vacate despite a competent authority's direction, the applicant stopped cheque payment as a preemptive legal measure—not an act of dishonesty. Since the respondent breached the settlement terms, no legal liability existed, making this fundamentally a civil dispute unsuitable for criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case