BRIJESHKUMAR JIVRAM MISHRA vs MOHAMMED ZAMIRULLA KHAN AND ANR Advocate - S C Chandratre, ,Pradyumna Sharma,RESPONDENT NO. 1 — APL/869/2018
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 30th March 2026.
CNR: HCBM010328482018
Filing Number
APL/869/2018
Filing Date
09-Jul-2018
Registration No
APL/869/2018
Registration Date
20-Jul-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BRIJESHKUMAR JIVRAM MISHRA
Adv. P D JAIN AND CO
Respondent(s)
-
1.MOHAMMED ZAMIRULLA KHAN AND ANR Advocate - S C Chandratre, ,Pradyumna Sharma,RESPONDENT NO. 1
-
2.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
30-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
30-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
Case Summary: APL/869/2018 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay allowed the applicant's petition and quashed Criminal Complaint No. 1089/SS/2018 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Key Reasoning: The court found that the cheque dispute arose from a civil matter involving property and maritime transactions. A consent agreement dated 27/01/2016 made the cheque conditional on the respondent vacating a leased flat. When the respondent failed to vacate despite a competent authority's direction, the applicant stopped cheque payment as a preemptive legal measure—not an act of dishonesty. Since the respondent breached the settlement terms, no legal liability existed, making this fundamentally a civil dispute unsuitable for criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
13-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
20-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
20-Feb-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
04-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
For Direction
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
21-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
05-Dec-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
-
10-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF
-
10-Nov-2025
For Admission /Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
-
30-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF
-
30-Sep-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
08-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
-
08-Aug-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
22-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
-
22-Jul-2025
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
07-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
-
07-Jul-2025
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar
-
17-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF
-
13-Jun-2025
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
-
22-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF
-
27-Feb-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. KarnikView PDF
-
22-Apr-2022
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere
-
08-Apr-2022
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite DereView PDF
-
08-Apr-2022
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere
-
14-Mar-2022
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite DereView PDF
-
14-Mar-2022
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere
-
28-Feb-2022
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite DereView PDF
-
28-Feb-2022
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere
-
24-Jan-2022
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite DereView PDF
-
24-Jan-2022
For Circulation
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere
-
10-Jan-2022
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite DereView PDF
-
15-Jun-2021
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari
-
07-Apr-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. GadkariView PDF
-
07-Apr-2021
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari
-
12-Mar-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. GadkariView PDF
-
12-Mar-2021
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari
-
17-Feb-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. GadkariView PDF
-
17-Feb-2021
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari
-
03-Feb-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. GadkariView PDF
-
03-Feb-2021
—
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari
-
13-Jan-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. GadkariView PDF
-
13-Jan-2021
—
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere
-
09-Dec-2020
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite DereView PDF
-
23-Sep-2020
For Admission - Fresh [Criminal Side Matters]
According To Sitting List
-
06-Mar-2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.M. BadarView PDF
-
06-Mar-2020
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar
-
07-Feb-2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.M. BadarView PDF
-
07-Feb-2020
Applications For Admission Fresh Criminal Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar
-
10-Jan-2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.M. BadarView PDF
-
10-Jan-2020
For Admission - Fresh [Criminal Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar
-
11-Nov-2019
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite DereView PDF
-
11-Nov-2019
For Admission - Fresh [Criminal Side Matters]
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere
-
05-Oct-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. GadkariView PDF
-
05-Oct-2018
Applications For Admission Fresh Criminal Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari
-
04-Sep-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. GadkariView PDF
-
04-Sep-2018
Extension Of Interim Relif
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari
-
06-Aug-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prakash D. NaikView PDF
-
06-Aug-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jul-2018
Case filed
Registration No. APL/869/2018
Case Summary: APL/869/2018 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay allowed the applicant's petition and quashed Criminal Complaint No. 1089/SS/2018 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Key Reasoning: The court found that the cheque dispute arose from a civil matter involving property and maritime transactions. A consent agreement dated 27/01/2016 made the cheque conditional on the respondent vacating a leased flat. When the respondent failed to vacate despite a competent authority's direction, the applicant stopped cheque payment as a preemptive legal measure—not an act of dishonesty. Since the respondent breached the settlement terms, no legal liability existed, making this fundamentally a civil dispute unsuitable for criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts