BRIJESHKUMAR JIVRAM MISHRA vs MOHAMMED ZAMIRULLA KHAN AND ANR Advocate - S C Chandratre, ,Pradyumna Sharma,RESPONDENT NO. 1 — APL/869/2018
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 30th March 2026.
CNR: HCBM010328482018
Next Hearing
06th August 2018
Filing Number
APL/869/2018
Filing Date
09-07-2018
Registration No
APL/869/2018
Registration Date
20-07-2018
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BRIJESHKUMAR JIVRAM MISHRA
Adv. P D JAIN AND CO
Respondent(s)
MOHAMMED ZAMIRULLA KHAN AND ANR Advocate - S C Chandratre, ,Pradyumna Sharma,RESPONDENT NO. 1
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
FOR ADMISSION - CIRCULATION (CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS)
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR DIRECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-08-2018 | FOR ADMISSION - CIRCULATION (CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS) |
| 30-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 20-02-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 04-02-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
Orders
Case Summary: APL/869/2018 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay allowed the applicant's petition and quashed Criminal Complaint No. 1089/SS/2018 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Key Reasoning: The court found that the cheque dispute arose from a civil matter involving property and maritime transactions. A consent agreement dated 27/01/2016 made the cheque conditional on the respondent vacating a leased flat. When the respondent failed to vacate despite a competent authority's direction, the applicant stopped cheque payment as a preemptive legal measure—not an act of dishonesty. Since the respondent breached the settlement terms, no legal liability existed, making this fundamentally a civil dispute unsuitable for criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: APL/869/2018 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay allowed the applicant's petition and quashed Criminal Complaint No. 1089/SS/2018 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Key Reasoning: The court found that the cheque dispute arose from a civil matter involving property and maritime transactions. A consent agreement dated 27/01/2016 made the cheque conditional on the respondent vacating a leased flat. When the respondent failed to vacate despite a competent authority's direction, the applicant stopped cheque payment as a preemptive legal measure—not an act of dishonesty. Since the respondent breached the settlement terms, no legal liability existed, making this fundamentally a civil dispute unsuitable for criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts