TATA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED vs NARAYANI RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED Advocate - AVYAAN LEGAL, ,AVYAAN LEGAL,AVYAAN LEGAL,AVYAAN LEGAL — CP/521/2025

Case under Contempt of Court Act 1971 Section 12. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010328112025

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

e-Filing Number

09-05-2025

Filing Number

CP/20810/2025

Filing Date

21-06-2025

Registration No

CP/521/2025

Registration Date

28-07-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

Bench Type

Single

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )

Sub-Category

CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Court Act 1971 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

TATA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

Adv. Dhwani Gala

Respondent(s)

NARAYANI RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED Advocate - AVYAAN LEGAL, ,AVYAAN LEGAL,AVYAAN LEGAL,AVYAAN LEGAL

MR. ANKUR AGARWAL

Adv. AVYAAN LEGAL

MR. ASHISH KARNANI

Adv. Neha Sonawane

Anurag Dalmia

Adv. AVYAAN LEGAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

30-06-2025

FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)

08-08-2025

Circulation Matters

23-06-2026

CONTEMPT PETITION FOR ADMISSION

05-05-2026

CONTEMPT PETITION FOR ADMISSION

09-04-2026

CONTEMPT PETITION FOR ADMISSION

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

Case Summary: CP/521/2025 Tata International Limited v. Narayani Resources Private Limited & Ors. The High Court of Bombay granted Tata International Limited liberty to file an affidavit-in-rejoinder addressing the respondents' reply to the contempt petition. The court also took on record a reply filed in related execution proceedings, which the petitioner's rejoinder must address. The case was adjourned by consent to June 23, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CP/521/2025 Tata International Limited v. Narayani Resources Private Limited & Ors. The High Court of Bombay granted Tata International Limited liberty to file an affidavit-in-rejoinder addressing the respondents' reply to the contempt petition. The court also took on record a reply filed in related execution proceedings, which the petitioner's rejoinder must address. The case was adjourned by consent to June 23, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case