JAMNADAS RATANSI (SINCE DECEASED) THR. LRS.(Legal Heir) vs ANILBHAI DWARKADAS BHATIA (SINCE DECEASED) THR. LRS. SAMIR BHATIA AND ORS. Advocate - Desai Desai Carrimjee and Mulla — CRA/495/2018

Case under Bombay Rent Act 1947. Next hearing: 18th March 2023.

CNR: HCBM010326542018

Next Hearing

18th March 2023

Filing Number

CRA/20619/2018

Filing Date

18-07-2018

Registration No

CRA/495/2018

Registration Date

05-09-2018

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Bombay Rent Act 1947

Petitioner(s)

JAMNADAS RATANSI (SINCE DECEASED) THR. LRS.(Legal Heir)

Adv. Kanga and Co 1.

MALTI DHIRSHI BHATIA1.

NANDINI DHIRSHI BHATIA1.

BHARAT DHIRSHI BHATIA

Respondent(s)

ANILBHAI DWARKADAS BHATIA (SINCE DECEASED) THR. LRS. SAMIR BHATIA AND ORS. Advocate - Desai Desai Carrimjee and Mulla

ASIT BHATIA

DIPIKA V. ASHER

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

06-08-2018

FOR ORDERS

18-03-2023

Revoked

14-03-2023

FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)

09-03-2023

FOR ORDERS-

23-02-2023

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Case Summary: CRA/495/2018 The Bombay High Court disposed of Interim Application No. 426 of 2026 on May 5, 2026. Based on an Architect's report indicating that the prayers sought in the interim application need not be considered at that stage, the court disposed of the application without granting the relief. All contentions of the parties were kept open for consideration in the main Civil Revision Application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRA/495/2018 The Bombay High Court disposed of Interim Application No. 426 of 2026 on May 5, 2026. Based on an Architect's report indicating that the prayers sought in the interim application need not be considered at that stage, the court disposed of the application without granting the relief. All contentions of the parties were kept open for consideration in the main Civil Revision Application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case