THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . THE GOVT. PLEADER. vs LALIT B. SACHADE . — FA/429/2004

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section ---. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010325442001

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

11th July 2005

Filing Number

FA/28971/2001

Filing Date

08-08-2001

Registration No

FA/429/2004

Registration Date

20-03-2004

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section ---
C.P.C.- (Non-Interlocutory Order) Section ---
Indian Evidence Act Section ---

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . THE GOVT. PLEADER.

Respondent(s)

LALIT B. SACHADE .

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

11-07-2005

REGULAR ADMISSION

11-07-2005

REGULAR ADMISSION

19-06-2026

-For Order- First Appeal

21-04-2026

-For Order- First Appeal

30-03-2026

-For Order- First Appeal

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The Bombay High Court dismissed Maharashtra's appeal in this land acquisition case, upholding the Joint District Judge's April 2001 judgment awarding respondent Lalit Sachade Rs. 18,360/- (versus the lower officer's Rs. 5,916/-). The court found no merit in interfering with the lower court's decision given the meagre amounts involved and the matter's prolonged pendency, directing the State to comply within 12 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed Maharashtra's appeal in this land acquisition case, upholding the Joint District Judge's April 2001 judgment awarding respondent Lalit Sachade Rs. 18,360/- (versus the lower officer's Rs. 5,916/-). The court found no merit in interfering with the lower court's decision given the meagre amounts involved and the matter's prolonged pendency, directing the State to comply within 12 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case