THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GOVT. PLEADER vs KASHINATH LAXMAN KHAMGAL — FA/442/2011

Case under Land Acquisition Act. Disposed: --Abated on 06th May 2013.

Case disposed Next hearing 31-Jan-2011

CNR: HCBM010321631998

Filing Number

FA/16289/1998

Filing Date

12-Dec-1212

Registration No

FA/442/2011

Registration Date

11-Mar-2011

Judge

Registrar(judicial II Fa)

Coram

Registrar(judicial II Fa)

Bench Type

Single

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

COMPENSATION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2013

Nature of Disposal

--Abated

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GOVT. PLEADER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KASHINATH LAXMAN KHAMGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed Maharashtra's land acquisition appeal and upheld the Reference Court's enhanced compensation of Rs. 5,678/- (versus the state's initial Rs. 3,421.25/-), finding the enhancement amount meager and following its established precedent in similar cases. The court also restored the abated appeal by condoning a 16-year delay and bringing the deceased respondent's legal heirs on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2013

    For Orders (Unserved Notice)

    Registrar(judicial II Fa)

  4. 06-May-2013

    For Orders (Unserved Notice)

    Registrar(judicial II Fa)

  5. 31-Jan-2011

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Dec-1212

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA/442/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed Maharashtra's land acquisition appeal and upheld the Reference Court's enhanced compensation of Rs. 5,678/- (versus the state's initial Rs. 3,421.25/-), finding the enhancement amount meager and following its established precedent in similar cases. The court also restored the abated appeal by condoning a 16-year delay and bringing the deceased respondent's legal heirs on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case