THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. vs SMT. MANCHALI RUPESH VASKAR AND ORS. — HCBM10319972016

Case under Workmens Compensation Act Section 30. Next hearing: 09th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010319972016

Next Hearing

09th May 2026

Filing Number

FA/21326/2016

Filing Date

01-08-2016

Judge

HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE , NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

Coram

HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE , NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

Other Appeals - Single Bench ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Workmens Compensation Act Section 30

Petitioner(s)

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.

Adv. poonam mital

Respondent(s)

SMT. MANCHALI RUPESH VASKAR AND ORS.

MASTER KUSHAL RUPESH VASKAR (MINOR)

MR. SACHIN DHANAJI VASKAR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE , NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

23-12-2021
11-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

09-05-2026
HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE,NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

Case Summary: The First Appeal filed by New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against Smt. Manchali Rupesh Vaskar and others has been disposed of by consent settlement. The parties agreed that the respondents (claimants) shall receive Rs. 9,94,743/-, while the insurance company shall receive Rs. 1,50,000/- from the total deposited amount of Rs. 11,44,743/-. All associated civil applications have also been disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The First Appeal filed by New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against Smt. Manchali Rupesh Vaskar and others has been disposed of by consent settlement. The parties agreed that the respondents (claimants) shall receive Rs. 9,94,743/-, while the insurance company shall receive Rs. 1,50,000/- from the total deposited amount of Rs. 11,44,743/-. All associated civil applications have also been disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case