BABAJI BAJIRAO AAGLE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE ADDL COMMISSIONER AND ORS Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER AS, ,GP WRIT CELL,GP WRIT CELL — WP/10058/2025

Case under Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section na. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 28th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010319302025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/20251/2025

Filing Date

18-06-2025

Registration No

WP/10058/2025

Registration Date

18-07-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND REVENUE CODE MATTERS ( 57 )

Sub-Category

Division Bench ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

28th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn

Acts & Sections

Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section na

Petitioner(s)

BABAJI BAJIRAO AAGLE

Adv. Narayan Rokade

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE ADDL COMMISSIONER AND ORS Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER AS, ,GP WRIT CELL,GP WRIT CELL

THE COLLECTOR NASHIK

LAXMAN WAGHU AHIRE

Adv. THORAT HITESH ANIL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

22-07-2025

FOR CIRCULATION

28-04-2026

FOR PASSING ORDER

23-04-2026

FOR PASSING ORDER

16-04-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

13-01-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

28-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Case Summary: WP/10058/2025 The Bombay High Court allowed petitioner Babaji Bajirao Aagale's withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to pursue alternate remedies. The court made no observations on the merits and kept all contentions open for future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/10058/2025 The Bombay High Court allowed petitioner Babaji Bajirao Aagale's withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to pursue alternate remedies. The court made no observations on the merits and kept all contentions open for future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case