THE MUNICIPAL CORPN. OF THE CITY OF PUNE PETITIONER SERVED vs M/S.AJAY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR. BHARAT M. KACHARE (SINCE DECEASED) and ORS 1. — WP/3694/1999
Case under Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act-1949. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010318611999
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/11722/1999
Filing Date
12-12-1212
Registration No
WP/3694/1999
Registration Date
03-07-1999
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE MUNICIPAL CORPN. OF THE CITY OF PUNE PETITIONER SERVED
Respondent(s)
M/S.AJAY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR. BHARAT M. KACHARE (SINCE DECEASED) and ORS 1.
SMT. SHAKUNTALA BHARAT KACHARE1.
MR. HEMANT BHARAT KACHARE1.
MR. SHAM BHARAT KACHARE1.
MR. AJAY BHARAT KACHARE1.
MRS. ANURADHA SHRIKANT BHUJBAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE
DUE ADMISSION
FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)
FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)
AT 3.00 P.M.
AT 3.00 P.M.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-10-2020 | DUE ADMISSION |
| 12-06-2026 | FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS) |
| 07-05-2026 | FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS) |
| 23-04-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 12-03-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/3694/1999 The Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition filed by the Municipal Corporation of Pune against Ajay Construction Company and others. The case was stood over to 12.06.2026 to allow the petitioner to file an affidavit of service with acknowledgment or postal endorsement regarding service of the amended petition upon respondents 2-5, which had not been received in the previous hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/3694/1999 The Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition filed by the Municipal Corporation of Pune against Ajay Construction Company and others. The case was stood over to 12.06.2026 to allow the petitioner to file an affidavit of service with acknowledgment or postal endorsement regarding service of the amended petition upon respondents 2-5, which had not been received in the previous hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts