SHRI CHANDRAKANT MANGALDAS PAREKH vs LIONS CLUB OF SILVASSA AND ORS Advocate - Girish Jawahar Paryani, R.NO. 11, 12 AND 19,R.NO. 17,R.NO. 16,R.NO. 4,R.NO. 2,R.NO. 6,R.NO. 7,R.NO. 5,R.NO. 1,R.NO. 10,R.NO. 14,THE LAUREATE,THE LAUREATE,THE LAUREATE,THE LAUREATE,THE LAUREATE,THE LAUREATE,THE LAUREATE,THE LAUREATE,THE LAUREATE,THE LAUREATE — WP/7888/2015
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010316032015
Filing Number
WP/20993/2015
Filing Date
03-Aug-2015
Registration No
WP/7888/2015
Registration Date
06-Aug-2015
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 02-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRI CHANDRAKANT MANGALDAS PAREKH
Adv. Mayuresh S Lagu
Respondent(s)
-
1.LIONS CLUB OF SILVASSA AND ORS Advocate - Girish Jawahar Paryani, R.NO. 11, 12 AND 19,R.NO. 17,R.NO. 16,R.NO. 4,R.NO. 2,R.NO. 6,R.NO. 7,R.NO. 5,R.NO. 1,R.NO. 10,R.NO. 14,THE LAUREATE,THE LAUREATE,THE LAUREATE,THE LAUREATE,THE LAUREATE,THE LAUREATE,THE LAUREATE,THE LAUREATE,THE LAUREATE,THE LAUREATE
-
2.SHRI FATEHSINH MOHANSINH CHAUHAN,
-
3.SHRI ANANT D. NIKAM,
-
4.SHRI DEVDAS R. SHAH,
-
5.SHRI VISHWESH B. DAVE,
-
6.SHRI KULDEEP SINGH MOONDRA, SIKH,
-
7.SHRI A. NARAYANAN,
-
8.SHRI PRAVIN J. PATEL,
-
9.SHRI PRAVINBHAI AMRUTBHAI PATEL
-
10.SHRI HARVADAN P. KANSARA
-
11.SHRI BALKRISHNA SHETTY, S/O. LATE SHEENA SHETTY,
-
12.SHRI AMRUTLAL KALURAM MUNDRA,
-
13.SHRI JASWANTSINH CHHIBUBHAI RATHOD,
-
14.DR. CHHATRASINH MOHANSINH CHAUHAN
-
15.SHRI JAWAHARLAL GOVINDJI DESAI
-
16.SHRI HIRABHAI PATEL, S/O. LATE LIHATIBHAI PATEL,
-
17.SHRI JAYENDRASINH G. RATHOD
-
18.SHRI HARSHAD HARGOVIND DOSHI
-
19.SHRI PRADEEP PURUSHOTTAM LELE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Chandrakant Mangaldas Parekh against Lions Club of Silvassa because the sole petitioner had died, and his legal heirs/representatives provided no instructions to continue the case. Since the petitioner's death extinguished the subject matter of the petition, the court found nothing surviving to adjudicate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
16-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
27-Nov-2020
Due For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari
-
15-Oct-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF
-
15-Oct-2019
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
-
17-Sep-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF
-
17-Sep-2019
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
-
01-Feb-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. TatedView PDF
-
01-Feb-2019
Due For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated
-
17-Oct-2016
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin JamdarView PDF
-
17-Oct-2016
For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar
-
12-Jul-2016
For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated
-
24-Jun-2016
For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated
-
19-Oct-2015
For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice R.M. Savant.
-
28-Sep-2015
For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice R.M. Savant.
-
31-Aug-2015
For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice R.M. Savant.
-
20-Aug-2015
For Production
Hon'ble Shri Justice R.M. Savant.
-
17-Aug-2015
For Production
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh G. Ketkar
-
13-Aug-2015
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh G. KetkarView PDF
-
13-Aug-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Aug-2015
Case filed
Registration No. WP/7888/2015
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Chandrakant Mangaldas Parekh against Lions Club of Silvassa because the sole petitioner had died, and his legal heirs/representatives provided no instructions to continue the case. Since the petitioner's death extinguished the subject matter of the petition, the court found nothing surviving to adjudicate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts