THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND ANR MR. U. H. KEDAR vs SMT. SUDHA RAMESH SHELAR — WP/7091/2013
Case under M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act Section ---. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 30th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010313962013
Next Hearing
05th August 2013
Filing Number
WP/21369/2013
Filing Date
03-08-2013
Registration No
WP/7091/2013
Registration Date
05-08-2013
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND ANR MR. U. H. KEDAR
Respondent(s)
SMT. SUDHA RAMESH SHELAR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
FOR PRODUCTION
AT 3.00 P.M.
AT 3.00 P.M.
AT 3.00 P.M.
FOR FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-08-2013 | FOR PRODUCTION |
| 23-04-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 06-03-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 06-02-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 11-04-2019 | FOR FINAL HEARING |
Orders
Summary The Bombay High Court upheld the Industrial Court's decision finding the Municipal Corporation's compulsory retirement of employee Sudha Ramesh Shelar unconstitutional. The court ruled that the Corporation failed to demonstrate genuine public interest grounds for retiring her at age 55, particularly given her recent 2010 promotion based on satisfactory service records and her unblemished disciplinary history. While denying full back wages (which the employee failed to prove with sworn evidence), the court granted continuity of service and retiral benefits until normal superannuation at age 58. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Bombay High Court upheld the Industrial Court's decision finding the Municipal Corporation's compulsory retirement of employee Sudha Ramesh Shelar unconstitutional. The court ruled that the Corporation failed to demonstrate genuine public interest grounds for retiring her at age 55, particularly given her recent 2010 promotion based on satisfactory service records and her unblemished disciplinary history. While denying full back wages (which the employee failed to prove with sworn evidence), the court granted continuity of service and retiral benefits until normal superannuation at age 58. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts