BHARAT INSULATION COMPANY (INDIA) LTD. (FORMERLY JYOTI WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD) vs CANARA BANK AND ANR. — CAF/3094/2018
Case under Indian Contract Act 1872. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010313042018
Filing Number
CAF/19829/2018
Filing Date
11-Jul-2018
Registration No
CAF/3094/2018
Registration Date
29-Aug-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHARAT INSULATION COMPANY (INDIA) LTD. (FORMERLY JYOTI WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD)
Adv. MADEKAR AND COMPANY
Respondent(s)
-
1.CANARA BANK AND ANR.
-
2.MMTC LTD.,
Case History
-
09-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Apr-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned First Appeal No. 930 of 2018 involving Bharat Insulation Company vs. Canara Bank concerning four letters of credit worth Rs. 5.23 lakhs. Rather than decide the substantive issues (whether exchange rate differences apply to INR-priced goods and whether demands can be made post-expiry), the Court encouraged the parties to settle the three-decade-old dispute amicably and listed the matter for 9th April 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Feb-2026
-Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
-
06-Feb-2026
-Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
-
01-Oct-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jul-2018
Case filed
Registration No. CAF/3094/2018
Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned First Appeal No. 930 of 2018 involving Bharat Insulation Company vs. Canara Bank concerning four letters of credit worth Rs. 5.23 lakhs. Rather than decide the substantive issues (whether exchange rate differences apply to INR-priced goods and whether demands can be made post-expiry), the Court encouraged the parties to settle the three-decade-old dispute amicably and listed the matter for 9th April 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts