DR.SULOCHANA D. TELANG AND ANR. TEJESH DANDE vs SHRI ARUN JAKHADE AND ORS. — IA/10175/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: --Dismissed on 26th March 2026.
CNR: HCBM010311972025
Filing Number
IA/19777/2025
Filing Date
13-Jun-2025
Registration No
IA/10175/2025
Registration Date
18-Jul-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
Against Order of Civil Court - Single Bench ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Dismissed
Last updated 22-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DR.SULOCHANA D. TELANG AND ANR. TEJESH DANDE
-
2.DR. LALA @ DATTATRAY AWAMAN TELANG
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHRI ARUN JAKHADE AND ORS.
-
2.SHRI.HEMANT JOSHI
-
3.SHRI. SACHIN KULKARNI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed Dr. Sulochana D. Telang's application seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal, as the appeal was filed approximately 180 days late (instead of within 90 days from the December 2011 Pune Court order). The court found that the applicant's reasons—settlement attempts and caution in handling papers—did not constitute "sufficient cause" as required by law, particularly since no supporting documents were provided. Consequently, both the delay condonation application and the First Appeal itself were dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
-
09-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
-
09-Jul-2025
For Ad-Interim Relief
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
-
25-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
-
13-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. IA/10175/2025
The Bombay High Court dismissed Dr. Sulochana D. Telang's application seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal, as the appeal was filed approximately 180 days late (instead of within 90 days from the December 2011 Pune Court order). The court found that the applicant's reasons—settlement attempts and caution in handling papers—did not constitute "sufficient cause" as required by law, particularly since no supporting documents were provided. Consequently, both the delay condonation application and the First Appeal itself were dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts