THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GOVT. PLEADER vs BHAGU HANMATA ZANKAR — FA/1039/2000

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section ---. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010309061999

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

16th December 2020

Filing Number

FA/17175/1999

Filing Date

12-12-1212

Registration No

FA/1039/2000

Registration Date

23-11-2000

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section ---
C.P.C.- (Non-Interlocutory Order) Section ---
Indian Evidence Act Section ---

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GOVT. PLEADER

Respondent(s)

BHAGU HANMATA ZANKAR

Adv. FOR RESP.NO.1 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

16-12-2020

FOR ORDERS [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

21-03-2025

FOR CIRCULATION

21-02-2025

FOR CIRCULATION

14-02-2025

FOR ORDERS (REGULAR)

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The High Court of Bombay dismissed Maharashtra's appeal in this land acquisition matter without interference to the lower court's judgment. The Joint District Judge, Nashik had awarded Rs. 1,89,422/- to respondent Bhagu Hanmata Zankar (against the initial Rs. 23,330/- by the land acquisition officer), and the court upheld this amount, directing the State to comply within 12 weeks, citing the meagre sums involved and excessive pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay dismissed Maharashtra's appeal in this land acquisition matter without interference to the lower court's judgment. The Joint District Judge, Nashik had awarded Rs. 1,89,422/- to respondent Bhagu Hanmata Zankar (against the initial Rs. 23,330/- by the land acquisition officer), and the court upheld this amount, directing the State to comply within 12 weeks, citing the meagre sums involved and excessive pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case