THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GOVT. PLEADER vs BHAGU HANMATA ZANKAR — FA/1039/2000
Case under Land Acquisition Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010309061999
Filing Number
FA/17175/1999
Filing Date
12-Dec-1212
Registration No
FA/1039/2000
Registration Date
23-Nov-2000
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GOVT. PLEADER
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHAGU HANMATA ZANKAR
Adv. FOR RESP.NO.1 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
The High Court of Bombay dismissed Maharashtra's appeal in this land acquisition matter without interference to the lower court's judgment. The Joint District Judge, Nashik had awarded Rs. 1,89,422/- to respondent Bhagu Hanmata Zankar (against the initial Rs. 23,330/- by the land acquisition officer), and the court upheld this amount, directing the State to comply within 12 weeks, citing the meagre sums involved and excessive pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Mar-2025
For Circulation
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
-
21-Feb-2025
For Circulation
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
-
14-Feb-2025
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF
-
14-Feb-2025
For Orders (Regular)
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
-
08-Jan-2025
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF
-
16-Dec-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Dec-1212
Case filed
Registration No. FA/1039/2000
The High Court of Bombay dismissed Maharashtra's appeal in this land acquisition matter without interference to the lower court's judgment. The Joint District Judge, Nashik had awarded Rs. 1,89,422/- to respondent Bhagu Hanmata Zankar (against the initial Rs. 23,330/- by the land acquisition officer), and the court upheld this amount, directing the State to comply within 12 weeks, citing the meagre sums involved and excessive pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts