MARIGOLD PREMISES PVT. LTD. vs MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD. — CAW/2522/2018

Case under Electricity (Supply) Act. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-Sep-2020

CNR: HCBM010308542018

Filing Number

CAW/19531/2018

Filing Date

10-Jul-2018

Registration No

CAW/2522/2018

Registration Date

30-Nov-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

Bench Type

Single

Category

ELECTRICITY ( 13 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 03-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity (Supply) Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MARIGOLD PREMISES PVT. LTD.

    Adv. SANTOSH SAWANT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

    The Bombay High Court allowed Marigold Premises Pvt Limited's application for impleadment as a respondent in the writ petition against MSEDCL and Tata Business Support Services Ltd. The court reasoned that since the original occupant/licensee who filed the appeal under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003 had vacated the premises, the current owner required party status. The case was adjourned to 29th April 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

  5. 11-Sep-2020

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  6. 10-Jul-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAW/2522/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed Marigold Premises Pvt Limited's application for impleadment as a respondent in the writ petition against MSEDCL and Tata Business Support Services Ltd. The court reasoned that since the original occupant/licensee who filed the appeal under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003 had vacated the premises, the current owner required party status. The case was adjourned to 29th April 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case