DANIEL GITAU MUNIYI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/2355/2025

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439. Disposed: Contested--Allowed To be withdrawn on 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010308382025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA/11818/2025

Filing Date

12-06-2025

Registration No

BA/2355/2025

Registration Date

12-06-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Regular ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed To be withdrawn

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8c,21c,23c,28,29,30,35,54

Petitioner(s)

DANIEL GITAU MUNIYI

Adv. Taraq Sayed

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

19-06-2025

FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

07-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

22-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

02-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

23-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Applicant Daniel Gitau Muniyi's bail application was dismissed as withdrawn after the court indicated disinclination to grant relief. The Trial Court was directed to expedite proceedings involving 15 witnesses expected to take 6-8 months, with liberty for the applicant to file a fresh bail application if trial remains incomplete within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Applicant Daniel Gitau Muniyi's bail application was dismissed as withdrawn after the court indicated disinclination to grant relief. The Trial Court was directed to expedite proceedings involving 15 witnesses expected to take 6-8 months, with liberty for the applicant to file a fresh bail application if trial remains incomplete within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case