VILE PARLE KELAVANI MANDAL AND ANR SHRI S.K. SRIVASTAV AND CO. vs KASHYAP PATEL AND ORS. — WP/7556/2005
Case under Bombay Public Trust Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010306172005
Next Hearing
06th March 2006
Filing Number
WP/21232/2005
Filing Date
16-09-2005
Registration No
WP/7556/2005
Registration Date
28-10-2005
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VILE PARLE KELAVANI MANDAL AND ANR SHRI S.K. SRIVASTAV AND CO.
PRAVIN H DOSHI
Respondent(s)
KASHYAP PATEL AND ORS.
C T SANGHVI
CHARITY COMMISSIONER MAHARASHTRA STATE BOMBAY
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE
FOR ADMISSION
AT 3.00 P.M.
AT 3.00 P.M.
AT 3.00 P.M.
AT 3.00 P.M.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2006 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 17-04-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 10-04-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 25-02-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 14-01-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
Orders
Summary of WP/7556/2005 The High Court of Bombay disposed of three consolidated writ petitions filed by Vile Parle Kelavani Mandal challenging Deputy Charity Commissioner orders from July 2005 regarding changes to the Reporting Trustee position. The court found the petitions infructuous because 28 years had elapsed since the 1998 changes were originally scheduled, subsequent trust modifications had already been reported to the Charity Commissioner, and no interim relief had been granted during the extended pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of WP/7556/2005 The High Court of Bombay disposed of three consolidated writ petitions filed by Vile Parle Kelavani Mandal challenging Deputy Charity Commissioner orders from July 2005 regarding changes to the Reporting Trustee position. The court found the petitions infructuous because 28 years had elapsed since the 1998 changes were originally scheduled, subsequent trust modifications had already been reported to the Charity Commissioner, and no interim relief had been granted during the extended pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts