BABUSHA DHONDIBA HOLE MRS. PALLAVI H. POTNIS vs MR. DADABHAU JOSHI, THE DISTRICT RESETTLEMENT OFFICER AND ORS — CP/395/2013

Case under Contempt of Court Act 1971. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

CNR: HCBM010304572013

Next Hearing

02nd July 2026

Filing Number

CP/20705/2013

Filing Date

29-07-2013

Registration No

CP/395/2013

Registration Date

12-09-2013

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

Bench Type

Division

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )

Sub-Category

CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Court Act 1971

Petitioner(s)

BABUSHA DHONDIBA HOLE MRS. PALLAVI H. POTNIS

Respondent(s)

MR. DADABHAU JOSHI, THE DISTRICT RESETTLEMENT OFFICER AND ORS

MRS. RESHMA MALI, THE LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER (NO.

PUNE

VIKAS DIESHMUKH, PUNE COLLECTOR

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

23-09-2013

FOR ADMISSION

02-07-2026

HIGH ON BOARD -

09-06-2026

FOR DIRECTION

05-05-2026

FOR DIRECTION

13-11-2019

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

09-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

Case CP/395/2013 Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the contempt petition filed by Babusha Dhondiba Hole against the District Resettlement Officer to 2nd July 2026. The Court directed the State authorities to file reply affidavits demonstrating the availability of alternate land in accordance with previous positive directions issued by the Court. The case involves land acquisition and resettlement matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case CP/395/2013 Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the contempt petition filed by Babusha Dhondiba Hole against the District Resettlement Officer to 2nd July 2026. The Court directed the State authorities to file reply affidavits demonstrating the availability of alternate land in accordance with previous positive directions issued by the Court. The case involves land acquisition and resettlement matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case