RADHU DHONDIBA HOLE MRS. PALLAVI H. POTNIS vs MR. DADABHAU JOSHI, THE DISTRICT RESETTLEMENT OFFICER AND ORS — CP/397/2013
Case under Contempt of Court Act 1971. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
CNR: HCBM010304532013
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
Filing Number
CP/20702/2013
Filing Date
29-07-2013
Registration No
CP/397/2013
Registration Date
12-09-2013
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )
Sub-Category
CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RADHU DHONDIBA HOLE MRS. PALLAVI H. POTNIS
Respondent(s)
MR. DADABHAU JOSHI, THE DISTRICT RESETTLEMENT OFFICER AND ORS
MRS. RESHMA MALI, THE LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER (NO.
PUNE
VIKAS DIESHMUKH, PUNE COLLECTOR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
FOR ADMISSION
HIGH ON BOARD -
FOR DIRECTION
FOR DIRECTION
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-09-2013 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 02-07-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD - |
| 09-06-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
| 05-05-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
| 13-11-2019 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Summary of CP/397/2013 In Contempt Petition No. 397/2013, Radhu Dhondiba Hole v. Mr. Dadabhau Joshi (District Resettlement Officer) and others, heard before the Bombay High Court on June 9, 2026, the case was adjourned to July 2, 2026. The Court directed the respondent-State authorities to file reply affidavits demonstrating the availability of alternate land in accordance with the Court's previous positive directions in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CP/397/2013 In Contempt Petition No. 397/2013, Radhu Dhondiba Hole v. Mr. Dadabhau Joshi (District Resettlement Officer) and others, heard before the Bombay High Court on June 9, 2026, the case was adjourned to July 2, 2026. The Court directed the respondent-State authorities to file reply affidavits demonstrating the availability of alternate land in accordance with the Court's previous positive directions in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts