THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GOVT. PLEADER vs MOTIRAM RAGHO FASALE — FA/1821/2007

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section ---. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010302181997

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

24th June 2007

Filing Number

FA/1532/1997

Filing Date

18-01-1997

Registration No

FA/1821/2007

Registration Date

14-06-2007

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

Bench Type

Single

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

AWARDS ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section ---
Indian Evidence Act Section ---
Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Section ---

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GOVT. PLEADER

Respondent(s)

MOTIRAM RAGHO FASALE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

24-06-2007

REGULAR ADMISSION

26-06-2007

REGULAR ADMISSION

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The High Court of Bombay dismissed Maharashtra's First Appeal in a land acquisition matter, upholding the Joint District Judge Nashik's judgment awarding Rs. 56,653 to respondent Motiram Ragho Fasale (versus the Land Acquisition Officer's initial Rs. 12,573). The court declined interference given the meagre amounts involved and the matter's prolonged pendency, directing the State to comply within 12 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay dismissed Maharashtra's First Appeal in a land acquisition matter, upholding the Joint District Judge Nashik's judgment awarding Rs. 56,653 to respondent Motiram Ragho Fasale (versus the Land Acquisition Officer's initial Rs. 12,573). The court declined interference given the meagre amounts involved and the matter's prolonged pendency, directing the State to comply within 12 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case