JAGUBAI JAGANATH PATIL AND ORS vs VASUDHA CONSTRUCTION COMPNAY THROUGH PARTNERS Advocate - JITENDRA HANUMANT OAK, RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 3. 1. — WP/10553/2019

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-Oct-2019

CNR: HCBM010301272019

Filing Number

WP/18139/2019

Filing Date

27-Jun-2019

Registration No

WP/10553/2019

Registration Date

27-Sep-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 03-May-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGUBAI JAGANATH PATIL AND ORS

    Adv. Law Counsellors

  2. 2.SEEMA RAMESH PATIL

  3. 3.KAVITAA RAMESH PATIL

  4. 4.NILESH RAMESH PATIL

  5. 5.UMESH RAMESH PATIL

  6. 6.RAM JAGANATH PATIL FOR SELF AND FOR SON KEDAR

  7. 7.RESHMA RAM PATIL

  8. 8.LAXMAN JAGANATH PATIL FOR SELF AND FOR DAUGHTER BHAVIKA AND SON VIVEK

  9. 9.SAPNA LAXMAN PATIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VASUDHA CONSTRUCTION COMPNAY THROUGH PARTNERS Advocate - JITENDRA HANUMANT OAK, RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 3. 1.

  2. 2.MILIND VASANT VANI1.

  3. 3.AMOL ANANT MALBARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the trial court's order refusing to refer parties to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act is appealable under Section 37 of the Act, and therefore the High Court lacked discretionary jurisdiction to interfere. The Court allowed the petitioners six weeks to file an appropriate appeal and directed the trial court to defer suit hearings during this period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

  5. 16-Oct-2020

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari

  6. 09-Mar-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. GadkariView PDF

  7. 09-Mar-2020

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari

  8. 27-Jan-2020

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite DereView PDF

  9. 27-Jan-2020

    For Production

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere

  10. 17-Dec-2019

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite DereView PDF

  11. 17-Dec-2019

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere

  12. 04-Oct-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. KarnikView PDF

  13. 04-Oct-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 27-Jun-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/10553/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the trial court's order refusing to refer parties to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act is appealable under Section 37 of the Act, and therefore the High Court lacked discretionary jurisdiction to interfere. The Court allowed the petitioners six weeks to file an appropriate appeal and directed the trial court to defer suit hearings during this period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case