JM Mhatre Infra Private Limited UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES vs Union of India — WP/1074/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section Article227,14,19,21. Next hearing: 03rd August 2026.

CNR: HCBM010294122025

Next Hearing

03rd August 2026

e-Filing Number

28-05-2025

Filing Number

WP/18576/2025

Filing Date

04-06-2025

Registration No

WP/1074/2026

Registration Date

21-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Bench Type

Division

Category

INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )

Sub-Category

GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section Article227,14,19,21
Finance Act

Petitioner(s)

JM Mhatre Infra Private Limited UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES

Respondent(s)

Union of India

Commissioner of CGST Central Excise Raigad Commissionerate

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

06-01-2026

OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED

08-06-2026

DUE ADMISSION - 1

03-08-2026

DUE ADMISSION - 1

Orders

08-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Case Summary: WP/1074/2026 JM Mhatre Infra Private Limited challenged a CGST order dated February 20, 2026, primarily on grounds of delay in issuance. The Bombay High Court issued notice returnable August 3, 2026, with respondents waiving service requirements. The court granted an ad-interim stay on coercive action against the petitioner and directed the respondents to file reply within six weeks, with petitioner liberty for rejoinder within two weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/1074/2026 JM Mhatre Infra Private Limited challenged a CGST order dated February 20, 2026, primarily on grounds of delay in issuance. The Bombay High Court issued notice returnable August 3, 2026, with respondents waiving service requirements. The court granted an ad-interim stay on coercive action against the petitioner and directed the respondents to file reply within six weeks, with petitioner liberty for rejoinder within two weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India Finance Act All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case