JM Mhatre Infra Private Limited UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES vs Union of India — WP/1074/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section Article227,14,19,21. Next hearing: 03rd August 2026.
CNR: HCBM010294122025
e-Filing Number
28-05-2025
Filing Number
WP/18576/2025
Filing Date
04-Jun-2025
Registration No
WP/1074/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JM Mhatre Infra Private Limited UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES
Respondent(s)
-
1.Union of India
-
2.Commissioner of CGST Central Excise Raigad Commissionerate
Case History
-
03-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Aug-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
08-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
Case Summary: WP/1074/2026 JM Mhatre Infra Private Limited challenged a CGST order dated February 20, 2026, primarily on grounds of delay in issuance. The Bombay High Court issued notice returnable August 3, 2026, with respondents waiving service requirements. The court granted an ad-interim stay on coercive action against the petitioner and directed the respondents to file reply within six weeks, with petitioner liberty for rejoinder within two weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
06-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/1074/2026
Case Summary: WP/1074/2026 JM Mhatre Infra Private Limited challenged a CGST order dated February 20, 2026, primarily on grounds of delay in issuance. The Bombay High Court issued notice returnable August 3, 2026, with respondents waiving service requirements. The court granted an ad-interim stay on coercive action against the petitioner and directed the respondents to file reply within six weeks, with petitioner liberty for rejoinder within two weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts