THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GOVT. PLEADER vs LAXMAN ANAJI TOCHE (DECEASE) BY LRS — FA/1306/2001
Case under Land Acquisition Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010290811999
Filing Number
FA/28018/1999
Filing Date
27-Aug-1999
Registration No
FA/1306/2001
Registration Date
24-Dec-2001
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GOVT. PLEADER
Respondent(s)
-
1.LAXMAN ANAJI TOCHE (DECEASE) BY LRS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed Maharashtra's First Appeal in a land acquisition matter, upholding the lower court's judgment dated December 31, 1998. The court awarded Rs. 1,83,240/- to the respondent (against the initial Rs. 43,265/- offered by the land acquisition officer), directing the State to comply within 12 weeks given the meagre amount involved and the matter's prolonged pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor,national Lok AdalatView PDF
-
02-Feb-2026
For Orders (Regular)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil , National Lok Adalat
-
13-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil,national Lok AdalatView PDF
-
13-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak,national Lok AdalatView PDF
-
02-Apr-2001
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Aug-1999
Case filed
Registration No. FA/1306/2001
The Bombay High Court dismissed Maharashtra's First Appeal in a land acquisition matter, upholding the lower court's judgment dated December 31, 1998. The court awarded Rs. 1,83,240/- to the respondent (against the initial Rs. 43,265/- offered by the land acquisition officer), directing the State to comply within 12 weeks given the meagre amount involved and the matter's prolonged pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts