MADHUKAR BHAGU KAWDE vs AJAY MORE — CP/464/2023

Case under Contempt of Court Act 1971 Section 159. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

Next hearing 01-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM010290372023

e-Filing Number

28-06-2023

Filing Number

CP/17223/2023

Filing Date

01-Jul-2023

Registration No

CP/464/2023

Registration Date

12-Oct-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Court Act 1971 Section 159

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADHUKAR BHAGU KAWDE

    Adv. abhishek deshmukh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJAY MORE

  2. 2.VIJAY DESHMUKH

  3. 3.SANDESH SHIRKE

  4. 4.UTTAM PATIL

  5. 5.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. 01-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jul-2026

    -Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF

    Case Summary: CP/464/2023 The Bombay High Court found that Revenue Authorities failed to comply with previous court orders, citing inadvertent errors in maintaining revenue records. The court criticized this pattern of non-compliance and directed the Divisional Commissioner, Pune, to file a detailed reply within six weeks without extension. The case was adjourned to July 1, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 01-Nov-2023

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  5. 25-Oct-2023

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  6. 18-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 01-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/464/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CP/464/2023 The Bombay High Court found that Revenue Authorities failed to comply with previous court orders, citing inadvertent errors in maintaining revenue records. The court criticized this pattern of non-compliance and directed the Divisional Commissioner, Pune, to file a detailed reply within six weeks without extension. The case was adjourned to July 1, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case