SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. THR. MR. SATPALSINGH RAJPUT vs MR. ANTONY VARGHESE MENACHERY THR.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE / POA MR. GEORGE JOSEPH AND ORS. — CAF/3314/2016
Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
CNR: HCBM010289882016
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
Filing Number
CAF/19322/2016
Filing Date
13-07-2016
Registration No
CAF/3314/2016
Registration Date
20-07-2016
Judge
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
Coram
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
MACP - Single Bench ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. THR. MR. SATPALSINGH RAJPUT
Adv. KMC LEGAL VENTURE
Respondent(s)
MR. ANTONY VARGHESE MENACHERY THR.AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE / POA MR. GEORGE JOSEPH AND ORS.
MISS DIVYA ANTONY MENACHERY (MINOR) THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE /P.O.A MR. GEORGE JOSEPH
MAS. DASMOND ANTONY MENACHERY (MINOR) THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE /P.O.A MR. GEORGE JOSEPH
SHRI. BHJIMRAI B. PATIL
MISS. DEEPTI ANTONY MENACHERY
Hearing History
Judge: Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
FOR CIRCULATION[CIVIL SIDE]
FOR ORDERS (REGULAR)
FOR ORDERS
FOR ORDERS
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-07-2016 | FOR CIRCULATION[CIVIL SIDE] |
| 02-07-2026 | FOR ORDERS (REGULAR) |
| 25-02-2019 | FOR ORDERS |
| 23-02-2018 | FOR ORDERS |
| 07-11-2017 | FOR ORDERS |
Orders
Case Summary: CAF/3314/2016 The Bombay High Court's civil appellate division adjourned proceedings on service issues. Notice to respondent No. 4 was re-issued for a 10-week return date due to expired extension time. The applicant's advocate was given a final two-week opportunity to serve notice on respondent No. 5; failure to do so will result in dismissal of the civil application at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CAF/3314/2016 The Bombay High Court's civil appellate division adjourned proceedings on service issues. Notice to respondent No. 4 was re-issued for a 10-week return date due to expired extension time. The applicant's advocate was given a final two-week opportunity to serve notice on respondent No. 5; failure to do so will result in dismissal of the civil application at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts