THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GOVT. PLEADER vs MR. RAMU RAMJI REHERE and ORS. — FA/570/2011

Case under Land Acquisition Act. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-Feb-2011

CNR: HCBM010289521998

Filing Number

FA/35711/1998

Filing Date

14-Oct-1998

Registration No

FA/570/2011

Registration Date

19-Mar-2011

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act
C.p.c.- (Non-interlocutory Order)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GOVT. PLEADER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MR. RAMU RAMJI REHERE and ORS.

  2. 2.MR. KASHIRAM RAMJI REHERE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed the State of Maharashtra's appeal against the Land Acquisition Officer's enhancement of compensation from Rs.6,288 to Rs.16,703 (an increase of Rs.10,415). The court declined to adjudicate the appeal on grounds of materiality, finding the amount in dispute (Rs.10,000) insufficient to warrant appellate consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Feb-2011

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 02-Feb-2011

    Notification

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka

  5. 14-Oct-1998

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA/570/2011

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed the State of Maharashtra's appeal against the Land Acquisition Officer's enhancement of compensation from Rs.6,288 to Rs.16,703 (an increase of Rs.10,415). The court declined to adjudicate the appeal on grounds of materiality, finding the amount in dispute (Rs.10,000) insufficient to warrant appellate consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case