RAJYA PARIVAHAN NIVRUTTA KARMACHARI SANGHATNA vs MAHARASHTRA STATE TRANSPORT KAMGAR SANGHTANA AND ORS — IA/1691/2024
Case under M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act Section NA. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010289462022
Filing Number
IA/17121/2022
Filing Date
14-07-2022
Registration No
IA/1691/2024
Registration Date
15-02-2024
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJYA PARIVAHAN NIVRUTTA KARMACHARI SANGHATNA
Adv. Vaibhav Jagdale
Respondent(s)
MAHARASHTRA STATE TRANSPORT KAMGAR SANGHTANA AND ORS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
DUE ADMISSION - 1
AT 3.00 P.M.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 16-04-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
Orders
Summary of IA/1691/2024 The High Court of Bombay allowed the writ petition and declared Clause 114 of a 1999 settlement between the Maharashtra State Transport Kamgar Sanghatana (recognised union) and MSRTC legal and enforceable. The court found the State Government's withholding of approval to this clause—which provided for 5% deduction from employee arrears for union fund—was unsustainable, as it imposed no financial burden on the State and was supported by Supreme Court precedent upholding such union fund deductions. The court directed MSRTC to remit approximately Rs. 10 crores of deducted amounts to the union within 12 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of IA/1691/2024 The High Court of Bombay allowed the writ petition and declared Clause 114 of a 1999 settlement between the Maharashtra State Transport Kamgar Sanghatana (recognised union) and MSRTC legal and enforceable. The court found the State Government's withholding of approval to this clause—which provided for 5% deduction from employee arrears for union fund—was unsustainable, as it imposed no financial burden on the State and was supported by Supreme Court precedent upholding such union fund deductions. The court directed MSRTC to remit approximately Rs. 10 crores of deducted amounts to the union within 12 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts