AMBADAS MAHADEV KHADE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR Advocate - GP WRIT CELL, R. NO. 1,RESP NO. 2,Ghanshyam K Tripathi — WP/7817/2018
Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 26th March 2026.
CNR: HCBM010286952018
Filing Number
WP/18214/2018
Filing Date
27-Jun-2018
Registration No
WP/7817/2018
Registration Date
20-Jul-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 20-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMBADAS MAHADEV KHADE
Adv. KAYVAL P SHAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR Advocate - GP WRIT CELL, R. NO. 1,RESP NO. 2,Ghanshyam K Tripathi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition and upheld the Labour Court's decision that the domestic enquiry against the petitioner was fair and the misconduct findings were not perverse. The court found that despite procedural gaps (absence of documentary proof of locker allotment, inconsistencies in the panchanama, and improper evidence handling), the circumstantial evidence—including the petitioner's admission that his apron was found in the locker and his possession of keys—sufficiently established unauthorized possession of company materials, meeting the preponderance of probabilities standard required in labour disputes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
-
13-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
-
09-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF
-
09-Jan-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
-
28-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF
-
28-Nov-2025
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
-
14-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF
-
27-Feb-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. GhugeView PDF
-
27-Feb-2025
Revoked
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
26-Feb-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. GhugeView PDF
-
24-Feb-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. GhugeView PDF
-
24-Feb-2022
Final Hearing – At Bottom Of Board
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
23-Feb-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. GhugeView PDF
-
23-Feb-2022
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
15-Feb-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. GhugeView PDF
-
15-Feb-2022
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
31-Jan-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. GhugeView PDF
-
27-Oct-2021
At 4.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni
-
29-Sep-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. KulkarniView PDF
-
14-Sep-2020
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. Gupte
-
16-Dec-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. GupteView PDF
-
16-Dec-2019
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. Gupte
-
10-Dec-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. GupteView PDF
-
10-Dec-2019
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. Gupte
-
23-Jul-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. SambreView PDF
-
23-Jul-2019
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre
-
09-Apr-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. KarnikView PDF
-
09-Apr-2019
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik
-
18-Mar-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. KarnikView PDF
-
18-Mar-2019
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik
-
10-Sep-2018
Hon'ble Smt. Justice S.S. JadhavView PDF
-
10-Sep-2018
For Admission
Hon'ble Smt. Justice S.S. Jadhav
-
14-Aug-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. GupteView PDF
-
14-Aug-2018
Petition For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. Gupte
-
31-Jul-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. GupteView PDF
-
31-Jul-2018
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. Gupte
-
25-Jul-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. GupteView PDF
-
25-Jul-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jun-2018
Case filed
Registration No. WP/7817/2018
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition and upheld the Labour Court's decision that the domestic enquiry against the petitioner was fair and the misconduct findings were not perverse. The court found that despite procedural gaps (absence of documentary proof of locker allotment, inconsistencies in the panchanama, and improper evidence handling), the circumstantial evidence—including the petitioner's admission that his apron was found in the locker and his possession of keys—sufficiently established unauthorized possession of company materials, meeting the preponderance of probabilities standard required in labour disputes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts