SANGAMNER TALUKA SAHAKARI DOODH UTPADAK and PRAKRIYA SANGH LIMITED vs BASWANT RANOJI PATIL A PROPRIETOR OF SANTOSH TRANS-TRADE — AO/921/2019

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order). Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

Next hearing 02-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM010286192016

Filing Number

AO/19067/2016

Filing Date

12-Jul-2016

Registration No

AO/921/2019

Registration Date

26-Sep-2019

Judge

Registrar(judicial II Ao)

Coram

Registrar(judicial II Ao)

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 03-May-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANGAMNER TALUKA SAHAKARI DOODH UTPADAK and PRAKRIYA SANGH LIMITED

    Adv. PAVAN PATIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BASWANT RANOJI PATIL A PROPRIETOR OF SANTOSH TRANS-TRADE

Case History

  1. 02-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Bombay allowed the appeal and set aside the lower court's order dismissing the Notice of Motion. The suit, which was dismissed in July 2013 due to the appellant's advocate's illness and non-appearance, is restored for hearing on merits. The court rejected the technical ground of dismissal (that the motion was signed by the advocate rather than an authorized officer) and held that the advocate was entitled to file the restoration application under the existing power of attorney. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  6. 24-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

  7. 28-Apr-2020

    For Admission

    According To Sitting List

  8. 30-Nov-2016

    Registrar(judicial II Ao)View PDF

  9. 30-Nov-2016

    For Orders

    Registrar(judicial II Ao)

  10. 26-Oct-2016

    Registrar(judicial II Ao)View PDF

  11. 26-Oct-2016

    For Orders

    Registrar(judicial II Ao)

  12. 05-Oct-2016

    Registrar(judicial II Ao)View PDF

  13. 05-Oct-2016

    For Orders

    Registrar(judicial II Ao)

  14. 14-Sep-2016

    Registrar(judicial II Ao)View PDF

  15. 14-Sep-2016

    For Orders

    Registrar(judicial II Ao)

  16. 22-Aug-2016

    Registrar(judicial II Ao)View PDF

  17. 22-Aug-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 12-Jul-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. AO/921/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Bombay allowed the appeal and set aside the lower court's order dismissing the Notice of Motion. The suit, which was dismissed in July 2013 due to the appellant's advocate's illness and non-appearance, is restored for hearing on merits. The court rejected the technical ground of dismissal (that the motion was signed by the advocate rather than an authorized officer) and held that the advocate was entitled to file the restoration application under the existing power of attorney. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case