ANUJ RAKESH BHARADWAJ vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — WP/2883/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 08th August 2025.
CNR: HCBM010283372025
Filing Number
WP/10724/2025
Filing Date
13-May-2025
Registration No
WP/2883/2025
Registration Date
14-May-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Quashing FIR, C.R., Charge Sheet - Crime against Women and Children ( 106 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANUJ RAKESH BHARADWAJ
Adv. SALMAN PATHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
-
2.VARSHA ANUJ BHARADWAJ
Case History
-
08-Aug-2025
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: WP/2883/2025 Writ Petition filed by Anuj Rakesh Bharadwaj (husband) and relatives challenging FIR No. 398/2024 for offences under Section 498A IPC and SC/ST Act arising from a matrimonial dispute. The wife (Respondent No. 2) filed the complaint but subsequently reconciled with the petitioners, filed an affidavit confirming settlement, and stated the SC/ST Act allegations were made in anger with no actual harassment occurring. Order: Both petitions ALLOWED and FIR quashed, subject to petitioners paying ₹25,000 each and respondent wife paying ₹25,000 as costs within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Aug-2025
-Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil
-
13-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF
-
13-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2883/2025
CASE SUMMARY: WP/2883/2025 Writ Petition filed by Anuj Rakesh Bharadwaj (husband) and relatives challenging FIR No. 398/2024 for offences under Section 498A IPC and SC/ST Act arising from a matrimonial dispute. The wife (Respondent No. 2) filed the complaint but subsequently reconciled with the petitioners, filed an affidavit confirming settlement, and stated the SC/ST Act allegations were made in anger with no actual harassment occurring. Order: Both petitions ALLOWED and FIR quashed, subject to petitioners paying ₹25,000 each and respondent wife paying ₹25,000 as costs within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts