ANUJ RAKESH BHARADWAJ vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — WP/2883/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 08th August 2025.

CNR: HCBM010283372025

Next Hearing

08th August 2025

Filing Number

WP/10724/2025

Filing Date

13-05-2025

Registration No

WP/2883/2025

Registration Date

14-05-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL

Bench Type

Division

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Quashing FIR, C.R., Charge Sheet - Crime against Women and Children ( 106 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
The Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes(prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s)

Petitioner(s)

ANUJ RAKESH BHARADWAJ

Adv. SALMAN PATHAN

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

VARSHA ANUJ BHARADWAJ

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL

13-06-2025

-ADMISSION

08-08-2025

-ADMISSION

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE

CASE SUMMARY: WP/2883/2025 Writ Petition filed by Anuj Rakesh Bharadwaj (husband) and relatives challenging FIR No. 398/2024 for offences under Section 498A IPC and SC/ST Act arising from a matrimonial dispute. The wife (Respondent No. 2) filed the complaint but subsequently reconciled with the petitioners, filed an affidavit confirming settlement, and stated the SC/ST Act allegations were made in anger with no actual harassment occurring. Order: Both petitions ALLOWED and FIR quashed, subject to petitioners paying ₹25,000 each and respondent wife paying ₹25,000 as costs within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: WP/2883/2025 Writ Petition filed by Anuj Rakesh Bharadwaj (husband) and relatives challenging FIR No. 398/2024 for offences under Section 498A IPC and SC/ST Act arising from a matrimonial dispute. The wife (Respondent No. 2) filed the complaint but subsequently reconciled with the petitioners, filed an affidavit confirming settlement, and stated the SC/ST Act allegations were made in anger with no actual harassment occurring. Order: Both petitions ALLOWED and FIR quashed, subject to petitioners paying ₹25,000 each and respondent wife paying ₹25,000 as costs within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case