SUSHMA RAKESH SHARMA AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — WP/2881/2025
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 528. Next hearing: 08th August 2025.
CNR: HCBM010283352025
Next Hearing
08th August 2025
Filing Number
WP/10723/2025
Filing Date
13-05-2025
Registration No
WP/2881/2025
Registration Date
14-05-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Quashing FIR, C.R., Charge Sheet - Crime against Women and Children ( 106 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUSHMA RAKESH SHARMA AND ORS
Adv. SALMAN PATHAN
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
VARSHA ANUJ BHARADWAJ
Adv. KISHOR AJETRAO
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL
-ADMISSION
-ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-06-2025 | -ADMISSION |
| 08-08-2025 | -ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/2881/2025 The High Court of Bombay quashed FIR No. 398/2024 and related chargesheet (Case No. 598/2025) in two consolidated criminal writ petitions challenging charges under IPC Section 498A and SC/ST Act provisions. The petitions were allowed after the complainant-wife (Respondent No. 2) affirmed affidavits on 5 May 2026 stating the underlying matrimonial dispute had been amicably settled, she now resides with her husband and child, her SC/ST Act allegations were made in anger without actual humiliation, and she seeks withdrawal of all proceedings. Each petitioner must pay Rs. 25,000 costs within four weeks as a condition precedent to the FIR quashing order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/2881/2025 The High Court of Bombay quashed FIR No. 398/2024 and related chargesheet (Case No. 598/2025) in two consolidated criminal writ petitions challenging charges under IPC Section 498A and SC/ST Act provisions. The petitions were allowed after the complainant-wife (Respondent No. 2) affirmed affidavits on 5 May 2026 stating the underlying matrimonial dispute had been amicably settled, she now resides with her husband and child, her SC/ST Act allegations were made in anger without actual humiliation, and she seeks withdrawal of all proceedings. Each petitioner must pay Rs. 25,000 costs within four weeks as a condition precedent to the FIR quashing order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts