SHITAL DEVSHI KHUNTI AND ANR vs ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF TOURISM , DIU AND ANR — WP/4782/2024
Case under The Goa,daman,diu Marine Fishing Regulation Act,1980 and Rules,1982 Section N.A. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010282212023
Filing Number
WP/16739/2023
Filing Date
26-06-2023
Registration No
WP/4782/2024
Registration Date
27-03-2024
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHITAL DEVSHI KHUNTI AND ANR
Adv. AUMKAR VIJAYKUMAR JOSHI
KIRAN MAHESH PARMAR
Respondent(s)
ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF TOURISM , DIU AND ANR
Adv. ,GARGE ANIRUDDHA ARUN,GARGE ANIRUDDHA ARUN 1123
REGIONAL DIRECTOR INDIA TOURIM, MUMBAI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA
FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-02-2024 | FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED) |
Orders
Case Summary: WP 4782/2024 The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by granting the petitioners one week to file a fresh application for tourist trade registration under the amended Goa, Daman and Diu Registration of Tourist Trade Act, 1982. The court directed the respondents to consider and decide such application within two weeks, and permitted the petitioners to request electricity supply restoration alongside their registration application, with all parties' contentions remaining open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP 4782/2024 The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by granting the petitioners one week to file a fresh application for tourist trade registration under the amended Goa, Daman and Diu Registration of Tourist Trade Act, 1982. The court directed the respondents to consider and decide such application within two weeks, and permitted the petitioners to request electricity supply restoration alongside their registration application, with all parties' contentions remaining open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts