SOU. ARATI ASHOK PATIL vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH TAHASILDAR AND ORS — WP/6645/2012

Case under Bombay Village Panchayat Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 19-Jul-2012

CNR: HCBM010281912012

Filing Number

WP/19055/2012

Filing Date

16-Jul-2012

Registration No

WP/6645/2012

Registration Date

17-Jul-2012

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Village Panchayat Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SOU. ARATI ASHOK PATIL

    Adv. sudhir prabhu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH TAHASILDAR AND ORS

    Adv. ADVS. FOR R. NO.3 TO 12 & 14 (C & VP FILED),GOVERNMENT PLEADER,R.NO. 1 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 6645 of 2012 filed by Arati Ashok Patil challenging a no-confidence motion as infructuous. Since the election period had already concluded by the time of judgment, the court found that no live controversy remained for adjudication and accordingly dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2014

    For Orders (Bhatta Not Paid)

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)

  4. 11-Mar-2014

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)View PDF

  5. 11-Mar-2014

    For Orders (Bhatta Not Paid)

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)

  6. 20-Jul-2012

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh G. KetkarView PDF

  7. 20-Jul-2012

    For Admission - Fresh [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh G. Ketkar

  8. 19-Jul-2012

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 16-Jul-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6645/2012

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 6645 of 2012 filed by Arati Ashok Patil challenging a no-confidence motion as infructuous. Since the election period had already concluded by the time of judgment, the court found that no live controversy remained for adjudication and accordingly dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case