LOKRAJYA SWAYAM ROJGAR SEVA SAHAKARI SANSTHA LTD vs SHRAMIK JANATA SANGH AND ANR Advocate - Hamza Lakdawala — WP/10551/2025

Case under M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010278882025

Filing Number

WP/17805/2025

Filing Date

09-May-2025

Registration No

WP/10551/2025

Registration Date

31-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

LABOUR MATTERS SINGLE BENCH ( 65 )

Sub-Category

CONTRACT LABOUR ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LOKRAJYA SWAYAM ROJGAR SEVA SAHAKARI SANSTHA LTD

    Adv. DASHRATH SHRIDHAR HATLE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRAMIK JANATA SANGH AND ANR Advocate - Hamza Lakdawala

  2. 2.REGIONAL MENTAL HOSPITAL THANE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed both writ petitions and upheld the Industrial Court's order directing a labor contractor to pay workers differential wages at statutory minimum wage rates. The court held that while contractors bear primary responsibility for wage payment under the Contract Labour Act, they cannot escape this obligation by claiming the principal employer must first disburse funds; workers' entitlement to minimum wages cannot be denied merely because work is performed through a contractor, and the contractor must arrange its affairs to ensure statutory compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  10. 20-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  11. 30-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  12. 30-Jan-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  13. 16-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  14. 06-Jan-2026

    High On Board -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale

  15. 19-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF

  16. 19-Dec-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale

  17. 21-Nov-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  18. 10-Nov-2025

    First On Board (Fob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  19. 13-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  20. 13-Oct-2025

    First On Board (Fob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  21. 29-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  22. 29-Sep-2025

    First On Board -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  23. 15-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  24. 05-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  25. 05-Aug-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  26. 25-Jul-2025

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri H.m.bhosale, Registrar(Judl I)

  27. 10-Jul-2025

    Shri H.m.bhosale, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

  28. 25-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 09-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/10551/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed both writ petitions and upheld the Industrial Court's order directing a labor contractor to pay workers differential wages at statutory minimum wage rates. The court held that while contractors bear primary responsibility for wage payment under the Contract Labour Act, they cannot escape this obligation by claiming the principal employer must first disburse funds; workers' entitlement to minimum wages cannot be denied merely because work is performed through a contractor, and the contractor must arrange its affairs to ensure statutory compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case