PITAMBAR K AHUJA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS — HCBM10276522026

Case under Mah. Regional Town Planning Act. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010276522026

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/16227/2026

Filing Date

12-06-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

TOWN PLANNING MATTERS INCLUDING MATTERS RELATING TO RESERVATION,TOWN PLANNING SCHEMES ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Mah. Regional Town Planning Act

Petitioner(s)

PITAMBAR K AHUJA

Adv. A R Gole

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

THE COLLECTOR DISTRICT THANE

GRAMPANCHAYAT SONALE VILLAGE

MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MMRDA)

TORRENT POWER LIMITED

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

12-06-2026

AT 5.00 P.M.

15-06-2026

AT 5.00 P.M.

Orders

12-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Case Summary: Petitioner Pitambar K. Ahuja filed an urgent writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging demolition of his structure by MMRDA. The court granted urgent hearing on 12th June 2026 after the matter was mentioned at 3:00 p.m., noting that the petitioner's structure was being demolished. The petitioner's counsel submitted that part of the wall had been demolished though the main structure remained intact. The court adjourned the petition and listed it for hearing before the regular bench on 15th June 2026 for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Petitioner Pitambar K. Ahuja filed an urgent writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging demolition of his structure by MMRDA. The court granted urgent hearing on 12th June 2026 after the matter was mentioned at 3:00 p.m., noting that the petitioner's structure was being demolished. The petitioner's counsel submitted that part of the wall had been demolished though the main structure remained intact. The court adjourned the petition and listed it for hearing before the regular bench on 15th June 2026 for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case