PRABHAKAR BALOBA INGALE SHRI.NITIN A.KULKARNI vs KIRLOSKAR BROTHERS LTD. and ANR. — WP/9863/2003
Case under Industrial Employment (Standing O.) Act. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM010275712003
Filing Number
WP/48847/2003
Filing Date
18-Dec-2003
Registration No
WP/9863/2003
Registration Date
30-Dec-2003
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRABHAKAR BALOBA INGALE SHRI.NITIN A.KULKARNI
Respondent(s)
-
1.KIRLOSKAR BROTHERS LTD. and ANR.
Adv. FOR R. NO. 1,M/S. RMG LAW ASSO. 1123
-
2.THE PRESIDING OFFICER
Case History
-
09-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jul-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar
-
23-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF
Case Summary: WP/9863/2003 The Bombay High Court consolidated multiple writ petitions (including WP/9863/2003) involving Kirloskar Brothers Ltd and others as petitioners against Rameshwar Domaji Patil and others. On April 23, 2026, the court ordered that notices be issued to respondent no. 1 in each petition (except WP/1068/2004), returnable on July 9, 2026. The advocate for respondent no. 1 informed the court of inability to maintain contact and sought discharge following Appellate Side Rules, 1960. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Aug-2005
Warn List ( Labour Act )
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Nishita Mhatre
-
23-Mar-2004
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Dec-2003
Case filed
Registration No. WP/9863/2003
Case Summary: WP/9863/2003 The Bombay High Court consolidated multiple writ petitions (including WP/9863/2003) involving Kirloskar Brothers Ltd and others as petitioners against Rameshwar Domaji Patil and others. On April 23, 2026, the court ordered that notices be issued to respondent no. 1 in each petition (except WP/1068/2004), returnable on July 9, 2026. The advocate for respondent no. 1 informed the court of inability to maintain contact and sought discharge following Appellate Side Rules, 1960. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts