PRABHAKAR BALOBA INGALE SHRI.NITIN A.KULKARNI vs KIRLOSKAR BROTHERS LTD. and ANR. — WP/9863/2003

Case under Industrial Employment (Standing O.) Act. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

CNR: HCBM010275712003

Next Hearing

09th July 2026

Filing Number

WP/48847/2003

Filing Date

18-12-2003

Registration No

WP/9863/2003

Registration Date

30-12-2003

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Industrial Employment (Standing O.) Act

Petitioner(s)

PRABHAKAR BALOBA INGALE SHRI.NITIN A.KULKARNI

Respondent(s)

KIRLOSKAR BROTHERS LTD. and ANR.

Adv. FOR R. NO. 1,M/S. RMG LAW ASSO. 1123

THE PRESIDING OFFICER

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

23-03-2004

DUE ADMISSION

09-07-2026

AT 3.00 P.M.

04-08-2005

WARN LIST ( LABOUR ACT )

Orders

23-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Case Summary: WP/9863/2003 The Bombay High Court consolidated multiple writ petitions (including WP/9863/2003) involving Kirloskar Brothers Ltd and others as petitioners against Rameshwar Domaji Patil and others. On April 23, 2026, the court ordered that notices be issued to respondent no. 1 in each petition (except WP/1068/2004), returnable on July 9, 2026. The advocate for respondent no. 1 informed the court of inability to maintain contact and sought discharge following Appellate Side Rules, 1960. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/9863/2003 The Bombay High Court consolidated multiple writ petitions (including WP/9863/2003) involving Kirloskar Brothers Ltd and others as petitioners against Rameshwar Domaji Patil and others. On April 23, 2026, the court ordered that notices be issued to respondent no. 1 in each petition (except WP/1068/2004), returnable on July 9, 2026. The advocate for respondent no. 1 informed the court of inability to maintain contact and sought discharge following Appellate Side Rules, 1960. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case