SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. S.R.SINGH and CO vs SMT. TEJKUMARI SHAMSHER BAHADUR YADAV AND ORS — CAF/3024/2013

Case under Workmens Compensation Act Section 30. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-Sep-2013

CNR: HCBM010273692013

Filing Number

CAF/18653/2013

Filing Date

08-Jul-2013

Registration No

CAF/3024/2013

Registration Date

12-Aug-2013

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )

Sub-Category

WORKMEN COMPENSATION ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 21-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Workmens Compensation Act Section 30

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. S.R.SINGH and CO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. TEJKUMARI SHAMSHER BAHADUR YADAV AND ORS

  2. 2.MAST. AAKASH SHAMSHER BHADUR YADAV (MINOR)

  3. 3.KUMARI. VARSHA SHAMSHER BAHADUR YADAV (MINOR)

  4. 4.SHRI. BHOLA LALLAN YADAV

  5. 5.SMT. RAMRAJI BHOLA YADAV

  6. 6.MR. RAJNATH RAMKARAN YADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court disposed of Shriram General Insurance's appeal, partly upholding the Commissioner's order but adjusting the compensation amount. While the court affirmed that the claimants deserve compensation despite policy fraud by the insurance company's employees (applying the doctrine of indoor management), it reduced the payable amount by Rs. 5,75,000 already received under a Motor Accident Claims Petition, as amounts cannot be claimed twice under different statutes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Sep-2013

    For Orders (Bhatta Not Paid)

    Registrar(judicial II Fa)

  4. 08-Jul-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAF/3024/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court disposed of Shriram General Insurance's appeal, partly upholding the Commissioner's order but adjusting the compensation amount. While the court affirmed that the claimants deserve compensation despite policy fraud by the insurance company's employees (applying the doctrine of indoor management), it reduced the payable amount by Rs. 5,75,000 already received under a Motor Accident Claims Petition, as amounts cannot be claimed twice under different statutes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case