SHRI. VISHNU KHANDERAI DAVANGE vs SHRI. RAMCHANDRA JAGGNATH DAVANGE Advocate - Ajay Misar And Company, RESPONDENT,AJAY MISAR & CO. FOR R.NO.1 (CAVEAT NOT VALID),AJAY MISAR & CO. FOR R.NO.1 (VP FILED),RESPONDENT,Ajay Misar And Company,Ramesh — SA/784/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Section 100. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010273112015
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
SA/18101/2015
Filing Date
07-07-2015
Registration No
SA/784/2015
Registration Date
17-10-2015
Judge
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE
Coram
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI. VISHNU KHANDERAI DAVANGE
Adv. Pramod Narayan Joshi,PRAMOD NARAYAN JOSHI,PRAMOD NARAYAN JOSHI, APPELLANT,Pramod Narayan Joshi
Respondent(s)
SHRI. RAMCHANDRA JAGGNATH DAVANGE Advocate - Ajay Misar And Company, RESPONDENT,AJAY MISAR & CO. FOR R.NO.1 (CAVEAT NOT VALID),AJAY MISAR & CO. FOR R.NO.1 (VP FILED),RESPONDENT,Ajay Misar And Company,Ramesh
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE
FOR ORDERS
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR DIRECTION
FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-08-2015 | FOR ORDERS |
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 08-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 25-03-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
| 09-03-2026 | FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS) |
Orders
Case Summary Second Appeal No. 784 of 2015 — Vishnu Khanderai Davange v. Ramchandra Jaggnath Davange The Bombay High Court admitted the second appeal on three substantial questions of law concerning property possession rights, partition theory, and Hindu Succession Act applicability. The court granted interim injunction restraining respondents from creating third-party rights in the suit property during appeal pendency, finding prima facie evidence supporting the appellant's settled possession claim based on revenue records and mutation entry no. 245. The appellant was directed to file a private paper-book within one year. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Second Appeal No. 784 of 2015 — Vishnu Khanderai Davange v. Ramchandra Jaggnath Davange The Bombay High Court admitted the second appeal on three substantial questions of law concerning property possession rights, partition theory, and Hindu Succession Act applicability. The court granted interim injunction restraining respondents from creating third-party rights in the suit property during appeal pendency, finding prima facie evidence supporting the appellant's settled possession claim based on revenue records and mutation entry no. 245. The appellant was directed to file a private paper-book within one year. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts