VIKAS KHANDU NADEKAR AND ANR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/7310/2026
Case under The Right of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Act2009 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010272392026
Filing Number
WP/15964/2026
Filing Date
11-06-2026
Registration No
WP/7310/2026
Registration Date
11-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI , HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI , HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE
Bench Type
Division
Category
OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )
Sub-Category
ALL OTHER SERVICE MATTERS - DB ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
12th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIKAS KHANDU NADEKAR AND ANR
Adv. K D POTE
SHANKAR VITTHAL RANJANEKAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS
SCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS DEPARTMENT STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI , HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/7310/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed the petitioners' withdrawal of their writ petition challenging a June 4, 2026 state communication that permitted Trained Teachers who had passed only TET-I paper (not TET-II) to apply for Cluster Resource Centre Coordinator positions. The petitioners sought to declare this communication contrary to Government Notification dated July 18, 2025 and Government Resolution dated August 29, 2025. The court granted withdrawal with liberty to challenge substantive appointments when made, keeping all contentions of the parties expressly open for future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/7310/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed the petitioners' withdrawal of their writ petition challenging a June 4, 2026 state communication that permitted Trained Teachers who had passed only TET-I paper (not TET-II) to apply for Cluster Resource Centre Coordinator positions. The petitioners sought to declare this communication contrary to Government Notification dated July 18, 2025 and Government Resolution dated August 29, 2025. The court granted withdrawal with liberty to challenge substantive appointments when made, keeping all contentions of the parties expressly open for future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts