SUVARNA SAVATA NALE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. THE SECRETARY — WP/7287/2026
Case under The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 11th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010272332026
Filing Number
WP/15958/2026
Filing Date
11-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/7287/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe
Bench Type
Division
Category
OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )
Sub-Category
TEACHING STAFF ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
11-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUVARNA SAVATA NALE
Adv. Padmaja Malgaonkar
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. THE SECRETARY
-
2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY
-
3.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION
-
4.THE ZILLA PARISHAD PUNE, THR ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
-
5.THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY)
-
6.BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
-
7.BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
The Bombay High Court disposed of Suvarna Savata Nale's writ petition challenging her exclusion from a provisional seniority list for teacher absorption. The court accepted the respondents' undertaking to reconsider her objection regarding the application of the "husband-wife together" criterion and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law, while keeping all parties' contentions open for future adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe
-
11-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/7287/2026
The Bombay High Court disposed of Suvarna Savata Nale's writ petition challenging her exclusion from a provisional seniority list for teacher absorption. The court accepted the respondents' undertaking to reconsider her objection regarding the application of the "husband-wife together" criterion and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law, while keeping all parties' contentions open for future adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts