SUVARNA SAVATA NALE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. THE SECRETARY — WP/7287/2026

Case under The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 11th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010272332026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/15958/2026

Filing Date

11-06-2026

Registration No

WP/7287/2026

Registration Date

11-06-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI , HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI , HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE

Bench Type

Division

Category

OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )

Sub-Category

TEACHING STAFF ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

11th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

SUVARNA SAVATA NALE

Adv. Padmaja Malgaonkar

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. THE SECRETARY

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION

THE ZILLA PARISHAD PUNE, THR ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY)

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI , HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE

11-06-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

11-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI,HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE

The Bombay High Court disposed of Suvarna Savata Nale's writ petition challenging her exclusion from a provisional seniority list for teacher absorption. The court accepted the respondents' undertaking to reconsider her objection regarding the application of the "husband-wife together" criterion and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law, while keeping all parties' contentions open for future adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of Suvarna Savata Nale's writ petition challenging her exclusion from a provisional seniority list for teacher absorption. The court accepted the respondents' undertaking to reconsider her objection regarding the application of the "husband-wife together" criterion and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law, while keeping all parties' contentions open for future adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case