ADVIK NARENDRA MASURE (MINOR )THROU. NARENDRA RAMCHANDRA MASURE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. ITS SEC. SCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS DEPT AND ORS — HCBM10272312026

Case under The Right of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Act2009. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM010272312026

Filing Number

WP/15956/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

Bench Type

Division

Category

EDUCATION ( 11 )

Sub-Category

ADMISSION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Right of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Act2009

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ADVIK NARENDRA MASURE (MINOR )THROU. NARENDRA RAMCHANDRA MASURE

    Adv. Sidheshwar Biradar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. ITS SEC. SCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS DEPT AND ORS

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

    Case Summary Petition Allowed (Interim Order) The Bombay High Court granted interim relief to a 6-year-old scheduled caste child whose school admission application was rejected for lack of a registered leave-and-license agreement. The court stayed the rejection letters and ordered the school to process the application, holding that the child's fundamental right to free education under Article 21A cannot be denied on technical grounds when substantial proof of residence exists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Petition Allowed (Interim Order) The Bombay High Court granted interim relief to a 6-year-old scheduled caste child whose school admission application was rejected for lack of a registered leave-and-license agreement. The court stayed the rejection letters and ordered the school to process the application, holding that the child's fundamental right to free education under Article 21A cannot be denied on technical grounds when substantial proof of residence exists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case