MAHARASHTRA STATE TRANSPORT KAMGAR SANGHTANA vs MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS. Advocate - Pinky Mohanlal Bhansali, SHRI. M.M.THORAT FOR RES.NO.5,SHRI. S.J. CHAUBAL FOR RES.NO.4.,SHRI. G. S. HEGDE FOR RES.NO.1.,AGP FOR RES.NO.2.,SHRI.P.K.JOSHI FOR R.NO.9,Nitesh V Bhutekar — WP/5871/2006

Case under M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 05-Sep-2006

CNR: HCBM010272012006

Filing Number

WP/19345/2006

Filing Date

18-Aug-2006

Registration No

WP/5871/2006

Registration Date

01-Sep-2006

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHARASHTRA STATE TRANSPORT KAMGAR SANGHTANA

    Adv. Devyani Kulkarni

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS. Advocate - Pinky Mohanlal Bhansali, SHRI. M.M.THORAT FOR RES.NO.5,SHRI. S.J. CHAUBAL FOR RES.NO.4.,SHRI. G. S. HEGDE FOR RES.NO.1.,AGP FOR RES.NO.2.,SHRI.P.K.JOSHI FOR R.NO.9,Nitesh V Bhutekar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/5871/2006 Maharashtra State Transport Kamgar Sanghatana v. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation The High Court of Bombay allowed the petition, holding that Clause No. 114 of a 1999 settlement—providing for 5% deduction from employee arrears toward union funds—is legal and enforceable. The court quashed the Industrial Court's dismissal and declared the State Government's withholding of approval unsustainable, finding no statutory authority to interfere with a binding statutory settlement that imposes no financial burden on the State. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  8. 30-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  9. 09-Jan-2007

    Hon'ble Shri Justice F.I. Rebello,hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjit More.View PDF

  10. 09-Jan-2007

    Due Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice F.I. Rebello , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjit More.

  11. 09-Jan-2007

    Due Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice F.I. Rebello , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjit More.

  12. 21-Dec-2006

    Due Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.H. Marlapalle , Hon'ble Shri Justice J.H. Bhatia

  13. 13-Dec-2006

    Due Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.H. Marlapalle , Hon'ble Shri Justice J.H. Bhatia

  14. 05-Sep-2006

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Dr. S. Radhakrishnan,hon'ble Shri Justice V.M. KanadeView PDF

  15. 05-Sep-2006

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 18-Aug-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5871/2006

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/5871/2006 Maharashtra State Transport Kamgar Sanghatana v. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation The High Court of Bombay allowed the petition, holding that Clause No. 114 of a 1999 settlement—providing for 5% deduction from employee arrears toward union funds—is legal and enforceable. The court quashed the Industrial Court's dismissal and declared the State Government's withholding of approval unsustainable, finding no statutory authority to interfere with a binding statutory settlement that imposes no financial burden on the State. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case