MAHARASHTRA STATE TRANSPORT KAMGAR SANGHTANA vs MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS. Advocate - Pinky Mohanlal Bhansali, SHRI. M.M.THORAT FOR RES.NO.5,SHRI. S.J. CHAUBAL FOR RES.NO.4.,SHRI. G. S. HEGDE FOR RES.NO.1.,AGP FOR RES.NO.2.,SHRI.P.K.JOSHI FOR R.NO.9,Nitesh V Bhutekar — WP/5871/2006

Case Summary: WP/5871/2006 Maharashtra State Transport Kamgar Sanghatana v. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation The High Court of Bombay allowed the petition, holding that Clause No. 114 of a 1999 settlement—providing for 5% deduction from employee arrears toward union funds—is legal and enforceable. The court quashed the Industrial Court's dismissal and declared the State Government's withholding of approval unsustainable, finding no statutory authority to interfere with a binding statutory settlement that imposes no financial burden on the State. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.