M/S. INDO AMINES LTD THR ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR SUDHAKAR R PATIL vs M/S HINDUSTAN MONOMERS PRIVATE LIMITED THR ITS DIRECTOR MR HEMANT RATNAKAR BANDODKAR — HCBM10271682026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.

Next hearing 24-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM010271682026

e-Filing Number

09-06-2026

Filing Number

ARP/15909/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. INDO AMINES LTD THR ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR SUDHAKAR R PATIL

    Adv. S S BUTALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S HINDUSTAN MONOMERS PRIVATE LIMITED THR ITS DIRECTOR MR HEMANT RATNAKAR BANDODKAR

Case History

  1. 24-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jul-2026

    Fresh Matters Auto Listed

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    Summary: In Arbitration Petition (ST) No. 15909 of 2026, the Bombay High Court (Justice Jitendra Jain) issued notice to respondent M/s Hindustan Monomers Private Limited on 19 June 2026, with a return date of 24 July 2026. The court permitted private service by all permissible modes in addition to court notice, with an affidavit of service to be filed. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Arbitration Petition (ST) No. 15909 of 2026, the Bombay High Court (Justice Jitendra Jain) issued notice to respondent M/s Hindustan Monomers Private Limited on 19 June 2026, with a return date of 24 July 2026. The court permitted private service by all permissible modes in addition to court notice, with an affidavit of service to be filed. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case