M/S. INDO AMINES LTD THR ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR SUDHAKAR R PATIL vs M/S HINDUSTAN MONOMERS PRIVATE LIMITED THR ITS DIRECTOR MR HEMANT RATNAKAR BANDODKAR — HCBM10271552026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.

Next hearing 24-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM010271552026

e-Filing Number

09-06-2026

Filing Number

ARP/15900/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. INDO AMINES LTD THR ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR SUDHAKAR R PATIL

    Adv. S S BUTALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S HINDUSTAN MONOMERS PRIVATE LIMITED THR ITS DIRECTOR MR HEMANT RATNAKAR BANDODKAR

Case History

  1. 24-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jul-2026

    Fresh Matters Auto Listed

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: In Arbitration Petition (ST) No. 15900 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the petition filed by M/s. Indo Amines Ltd. against M/s. Hindustan Monomers Private Limited was taken up on 19 June 2026. The court issued notice to the respondent returnable on 24 July 2026 and permitted private service by all permissible modes. The case was adjourned pending the respondent's response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: In Arbitration Petition (ST) No. 15900 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the petition filed by M/s. Indo Amines Ltd. against M/s. Hindustan Monomers Private Limited was taken up on 19 June 2026. The court issued notice to the respondent returnable on 24 July 2026 and permitted private service by all permissible modes. The case was adjourned pending the respondent's response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case