SHAIKH IQBAL HASAN IBRAHIM KASKAR vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocate - Rebecca Gonsalvez, RESPONDENT NO.1 AND 3,RESPONDENT NO.1, 2, 3,Hiten Shyamrao Venegaokar,ARUNA PAI — WP/2659/2015
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010270102015
Filing Number
WP/2659/2015
Filing Date
05-Jul-2015
Registration No
WP/2659/2015
Registration Date
06-Jul-2015
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
11-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAIKH IQBAL HASAN IBRAHIM KASKAR
Adv. SHYAM B KESWANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocate - Rebecca Gonsalvez, RESPONDENT NO.1 AND 3,RESPONDENT NO.1, 2, 3,Hiten Shyamrao Venegaokar,ARUNA PAI
-
2.THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY
-
3.SMUGGLERS AND FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANIPULATOR AUTHORITY
-
4.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja BhonsaleView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed Criminal Writ Petition No. 2659 of 2015 filed by Shaikh Iqbal Hasan Ibrahim Kaskar against the Union of India for non-prosecution. The petitioner failed to appear when the matter was called and had not taken any steps to advance the petition since August 3, 2015, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Jul-2021
For Admission - Fresh [Criminal Side Matters]
According To Sitting List
-
03-Aug-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jul-2015
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2659/2015
The Bombay High Court dismissed Criminal Writ Petition No. 2659 of 2015 filed by Shaikh Iqbal Hasan Ibrahim Kaskar against the Union of India for non-prosecution. The petitioner failed to appear when the matter was called and had not taken any steps to advance the petition since August 3, 2015, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts