TIRUMALESH MALLESHAM KATLA vs THE STATE OFMAHARASHTRA — ABA/1490/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
CNR: HCBM010265972026
Filing Number
ABA/11071/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
ABA/1490/2026
Registration Date
08-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TIRUMALESH MALLESHAM KATLA
Adv. Raju Suryawanshi
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OFMAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jul-2026
Fresh Admission (Anticipatory Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
-
11-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
Case Summary: ABA/1490/2026 Outcome: Ad-interim anticipatory bail granted. Tirumalesh Mallesham Katla will be released on bail upon arrest in Crime No. 340/2026 (registered at Bhiwandi City Police Station) for offences under BNS sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2), and 351(2), on furnishing a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 50,000 with surety of equal amount. The case involves a family dispute over LIC policy surrenders; the court found no criminal antecedents and determined personal liberty required protection. Bail conditions include weekly police station attendance, cooperation with investigations, and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABA/1490/2026
Case Summary: ABA/1490/2026 Outcome: Ad-interim anticipatory bail granted. Tirumalesh Mallesham Katla will be released on bail upon arrest in Crime No. 340/2026 (registered at Bhiwandi City Police Station) for offences under BNS sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2), and 351(2), on furnishing a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 50,000 with surety of equal amount. The case involves a family dispute over LIC policy surrenders; the court found no criminal antecedents and determined personal liberty required protection. Bail conditions include weekly police station attendance, cooperation with investigations, and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts