TIRUMALESH MALLESHAM KATLA vs THE STATE OFMAHARASHTRA — ABA/1490/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
CNR: HCBM010265972026
Next Hearing
03rd July 2026
Filing Number
ABA/11071/2026
Filing Date
08-06-2026
Registration No
ABA/1490/2026
Registration Date
08-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TIRUMALESH MALLESHAM KATLA
Adv. Raju Suryawanshi
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OFMAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR
FRESH ADMISSION (ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FRESH ADMISSION (ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATIONS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 03-07-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
Orders
Case Summary: ABA/1490/2026 Outcome: Ad-interim anticipatory bail granted. Tirumalesh Mallesham Katla will be released on bail upon arrest in Crime No. 340/2026 (registered at Bhiwandi City Police Station) for offences under BNS sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2), and 351(2), on furnishing a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 50,000 with surety of equal amount. The case involves a family dispute over LIC policy surrenders; the court found no criminal antecedents and determined personal liberty required protection. Bail conditions include weekly police station attendance, cooperation with investigations, and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: ABA/1490/2026 Outcome: Ad-interim anticipatory bail granted. Tirumalesh Mallesham Katla will be released on bail upon arrest in Crime No. 340/2026 (registered at Bhiwandi City Police Station) for offences under BNS sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2), and 351(2), on furnishing a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 50,000 with surety of equal amount. The case involves a family dispute over LIC policy surrenders; the court found no criminal antecedents and determined personal liberty required protection. Bail conditions include weekly police station attendance, cooperation with investigations, and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts