NITUL MAHENDRABHAI DOSHI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/2351/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010265792026

Filing Number

BA/11067/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

BA/2351/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Regular ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(c),21(b),29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITUL MAHENDRABHAI DOSHI

    Adv. MALLIKA NATRAJ SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

    Summary: BA/2351/2026 - Nitul Mahendrabhai Doshi v. State of Maharashtra The High Court of Bombay granted bail to Nitul Mahendrabhai Doshi in an NDPS Act case where he was arrested for possessing 5.7 grams of Mephedrone (non-commercial quantity). The court found that since investigation was complete, chargesheet filed, and continued detention served no purpose, bail was warranted despite prior antecedents. Applicant was released on Rs.50,000 bond with monthly police attendance and standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    —

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA/2351/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: BA/2351/2026 - Nitul Mahendrabhai Doshi v. State of Maharashtra The High Court of Bombay granted bail to Nitul Mahendrabhai Doshi in an NDPS Act case where he was arrested for possessing 5.7 grams of Mephedrone (non-commercial quantity). The court found that since investigation was complete, chargesheet filed, and continued detention served no purpose, bail was warranted despite prior antecedents. Applicant was released on Rs.50,000 bond with monthly police attendance and standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case