ARIHANT NAGARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT M/S. J. SHEKHAR AND CO. vs MANGILAL JIVRAJ CHHAJED AND ANR. — APEAL/827/2008
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010265562008
Filing Number
APEAL/827/2008
Filing Date
12-Aug-2008
Registration No
APEAL/827/2008
Registration Date
12-Aug-2008
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST ORDER OF ACQUITTAL ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 04-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARIHANT NAGARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT M/S. J. SHEKHAR AND CO.
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANGILAL JIVRAJ CHHAJED AND ANR.
-
2.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF
The Bombay High Court transferred a criminal appeal against an acquittal in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case from the High Court to the Sessions Court, finding that the Sessions Court is the competent forum to hear such appeals by victims/complainants under Section 372 CrPC. The Court relied on Supreme Court precedent establishing that complainants have a statutory right to appeal acquittal orders and directed expeditious disposal of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF
-
11-Feb-2023
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor,national Lok AdalatView PDF
-
17-Jan-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
-
12-Aug-2008
Case filed
Registration No. APEAL/827/2008
-
28-Jul-2008
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jul-2008
Notification
Hon'ble Shri Justice K.U. Chandiwal
The Bombay High Court transferred a criminal appeal against an acquittal in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case from the High Court to the Sessions Court, finding that the Sessions Court is the competent forum to hear such appeals by victims/complainants under Section 372 CrPC. The Court relied on Supreme Court precedent establishing that complainants have a statutory right to appeal acquittal orders and directed expeditious disposal of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts