MADHUKAR KRISHNA PATIL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. DEPT. OF LAND ACQUISITION — WP/7226/2026
Case under National Highway Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010265312026
Filing Number
WP/15473/2026
Filing Date
08-06-2026
Registration No
WP/7226/2026
Registration Date
09-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
12th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MADHUKAR KRISHNA PATIL
Adv. sagar
DASHRATH BALAJI PATIL
DILKHUSH SAKHARAM PATIL
PRAVIN KUDALIK PATIL
JANARDAN DHONDU PATIL
ABHIMANU DASHRATH PATIL
BHAGWAN SAVLARAM PATIL
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. DEPT. OF LAND ACQUISITION
THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER KALYAN
HORIZON PROJECT PVT. LTD
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP 7226/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed the petitioners' writ petition challenging the Land Acquisition Officer's order rejecting their objection to compensation disbursal for acquired land. The court held that the officer correctly rejected the objection despite a pending civil suit (filed 2015) between the petitioners and the recorded owner, as the petitioners failed to obtain any stay order from the civil court and their property rights remained inchoate. The court noted that if the petitioners succeed in the pending civil suit, they can recover the disbursed compensation from the recorded owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP 7226/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed the petitioners' writ petition challenging the Land Acquisition Officer's order rejecting their objection to compensation disbursal for acquired land. The court held that the officer correctly rejected the objection despite a pending civil suit (filed 2015) between the petitioners and the recorded owner, as the petitioners failed to obtain any stay order from the civil court and their property rights remained inchoate. The court noted that if the petitioners succeed in the pending civil suit, they can recover the disbursed compensation from the recorded owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts