NIKUNJ DEVELOPERS AND ANR vs MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY AND ORS — WP/9268/2023
Case under Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Section NA. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010262022023
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
WP/15511/2023
Filing Date
14-06-2023
Registration No
WP/9268/2023
Registration Date
26-07-2023
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NIKUNJ DEVELOPERS AND ANR
Adv. CHINMAYA ACHARYA
HARESH N SANGHAVI
Respondent(s)
MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY AND ORS
MAHARASTHRA REAL EASTATE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
MAHESHKUMAR BALMIKI
Adv. Govind Bhagwanrao Solanke
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-08-2023 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 23-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 11-10-2023 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/9268/2023 The High Court of Bombay allowed the petitioner's request to convert the writ petition into a Second Appeal. The petition challenged MahaRERA's November 22, 2022 order refusing to condone delay in filing an appeal against the original RERA order dated July 3, 2019. The court granted permission for conversion to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, directing the petitioner's counsel to specify grounds of appeal during conversion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/9268/2023 The High Court of Bombay allowed the petitioner's request to convert the writ petition into a Second Appeal. The petition challenged MahaRERA's November 22, 2022 order refusing to condone delay in filing an appeal against the original RERA order dated July 3, 2019. The court granted permission for conversion to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, directing the petitioner's counsel to specify grounds of appeal during conversion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts