SHRI. DYANESHWAR BABURAO SHIRSAT vs MADHAV KHANDERAO SHIRSATH (D/H) — CAS/975/2018

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order). Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM010261282018

Filing Number

CAS/16592/2018

Filing Date

13-Jun-2018

Registration No

CAS/975/2018

Registration Date

02-Aug-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI. DYANESHWAR BABURAO SHIRSAT

    Adv. Pramod Narayan Joshi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MADHAV KHANDERAO SHIRSATH (D/H)

    Adv. J J ASSOCIATES FOR R NO 3,4A TO 4C,5,6, 8 TO 11 VP,FILED IN SA.,CAS STAND ABATED AS AGAINST DECEASED R NO 1 & 2,VIDE REG JUDL II ORDER DT 26/06/2019. 1123

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Bombay admitted Second Appeal No. 395 of 2014 on a substantial question of law regarding whether the plaintiff is entitled to declaration and injunction concerning entries in a consolidation scheme. Notices have been directed to respondents, with the case to be heard jointly with Writ Petition No. 5565 of 2019, and the appellant's advocate must file a private paper-book within one year. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

  4. 07-Jan-2021

    For Admission - After Notice CIVIL Side Matters

    According To Sitting List

  5. 26-Jun-2019

    —View PDF

  6. 04-Jun-2019

    —View PDF

  7. 15-Apr-2019

    —View PDF

  8. 08-Mar-2019

    Registrar(judicial II Sa)View PDF

  9. 08-Mar-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 13-Jun-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAS/975/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Bombay admitted Second Appeal No. 395 of 2014 on a substantial question of law regarding whether the plaintiff is entitled to declaration and injunction concerning entries in a consolidation scheme. Notices have been directed to respondents, with the case to be heard jointly with Writ Petition No. 5565 of 2019, and the appellant's advocate must file a private paper-book within one year. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case